SEMINAR CONTENT EVALUATION
Institute
of Chartered Accountants of Alberta
Course 0638 : Unveiling the Retirement Myth
Calgary, November 29, 2004 8:30 am - 12:00 pm
Edmonton,
November 30, 2004 8:30 am - 12:00 pm
PARTICIPANTS:
Returns: 56
Participants:
85
Rate of Response:
66%
DEPTH:
Is the seminar material of sufficient depth/breadth to impart new information to you?
|
Too Broad: 0 |
Just Right: 45 |
Not Enough: 2 |
EXPECTATIONS:
Did the seminar, as advertised, meet your expectations?
|
Too Broad: 0 |
Just Right: 50 |
Not Enough: 2 |
USEFUL REFERENCE:
Will the material be a useful reference source for you?
|
Yes: 48 |
No: 1 |
Somewhat: 5 |
VALUE:
Was this seminar of practical value to you?
|
Yes: 50 |
No: 0 |
Somewhat: 5 |
RECOMMEND:
Would you recommend this seminar to others?
|
Strongly: 31 |
Recommend: 22 |
No: 2 |
APPEAL:
Provided
formulae for retirement planning.
Excellent.
Good
information - very practical and useful.
Impact
of material history.
Practical
and useful information.
Very
useful information. The
presenter did not get into the details of the software program which
Practical
tools versus the critical.
Excellent
approach to retirement planning - interesting to see "engineering"
perspective.
Presentation
"out of the box" which is a change!
Very
good.
More
realistic approach to retirement planning than traditional methods.
The
examples
Content
very good.
SEMINAR CONTENT EVALUATION
Logical
thought and alternative views. This
is the single best non-technical course ever offered.
Basically
geared to mutual funds sales.
Some
of his ideas on financial planning are interesting.
Relevant
to my own situation.
Provide
a supportable alternative point of view on the subject matter.
This
is a reality check to offset the "misinformation" currently
promoted by financial planners; the
Access
to the software is very worthwhile.
Understanding
risks of different market cycles on pre and post retirement planning.
Workable
solutions provided.
Very
informative.
Logical
approach on a difficult issue (re retirement).
Excellent
course (a bit contrarian) but good food for thought.
Excellent use of PowerPoint, best ever
run in these courses.
Very
good alternate approach to material.
No
group brainstorming (I don't like group work).
No group case studies.
Wednesday, December 08, 2004